The Master said: Tao cannot be far away. If a person is far away from others for the Tao, he will not be considered as the Tao.

The Later Confucians generally believed that “The sentence “The Tao is not far away” has profound meaning. Cheng Xuan, the great genius of science and technology in Northern Song Dynasty, is the chief executive of the Northern Song Dynasty. x the fake can be suffocated. The ultimate handsome male singer Cheng Xi believed that “this special saint is the first to the beginner” (“Er Cheng Collection”, page 321), is the beginning and question of the saint instigated by the beginners. href=”https://www.taiwanlovelog.com/Penny/%e8%b8%8f%e5%85%a5%e5%8c%85%e9%a4%8a%e8%a1%8c%e5%88%97/”>Baobao. In the early Qing Dynasty, a scholar Xie Wenbang even trusted this sentenceBaobao.com “Simple and realistic” hides the sacred password. Just “regress and take it back and taste it” (Xi Wenbian, page 613), and the truth is revealed.

The concept of Tao is applied in Chinese classics and its meaning includes Justice, justice, peace, path, fantasy, method, and enlightenment, etc. Their usage includes the way of heaven, tunnel, human nature, the way of teachers, the way of kings, and the way of ministers. (Political communication, page 652) So what kind of way does the way of “the way is not far away” refer to? In this regard, we have come to pay attention to the explanation of the differences between the school and the current scholars have many opinions. (See Chen Jianbin, 1999; Fang Xudong, 2008; Kong Deli, 2Baohua.com014) The word training cannot be separated from the article. Therefore, understanding “Tao is not far away” cannot be too far away from it, nor can it be ignored in the relationship between it and the high and low articles of “Doing the Mean”. Zhu Xi’s “Doing the Mean” said in the summary chapter 12: “The first chapter of Tao cannot be separated by saying “Tao is called “The first chapter of Tao cannot be separated.” In the next eight chapters, we will introduce Confucius’ words to clarify it. ” (Zhu Xi, page 23) This means that the twelfth chapter of the “Doing the Mean” means “The Tao cannot be separated”, and the thirteenth chapter (i.e., “The Tao is not far away from others平台生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生生”Zhu Xi explained: “Fee is the most abundant use. Hidden means the subtlety of the body. “(Ibid., page 22) Tao is effective, and the cost is used from the Tao, and the implicit is from the body of Tao. Regarding the implicit amount of Tao, Chapter 12 of the Doctrine of the Mean says: “There is no one in the country that can carry it in big words; if the language is small, the whole country that can destroy it. “After reading this sentence, we will naturally think of the sentence in Hui Shi’s “Ten Things to Do in Life”: “At the most big, it is the most big; at the very small, it is the only small, it is the only big.>Supplement network dcard‘s smallest. “(“Zangzi·National Country”) Zhu Xi understood this way: “The way of correcting people is close to the house between the husband and wife, and farther away from the sages’ six-member relationship, which is impossible to overcome. It is big and small, and it is small and has no inner space, which can be said to be expensive. “(Zhu Xi, page 22) Since Chapter 13 is a step further to Chapter 12, then “Tao is not far away” can also be used to understand the cost of Tao. That is to say, “Tao is not far away” is used in the way. From the use of Tao, it is large and “invisible” (“Zangzi·National”); from the way of Tao, although it is slight, the meaning of Zhu is extremely rich.

Its big and nothing, its small and nothing inside, The invisible way expresses a complete concept. For this complete concept, disagreeable scholars can propose differential equal concepts. For example, the philosopher Rongyoulan calls it “big complete” (英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英英� ” (Zhang Shunhui, page 33) Tang Junyi, from a comparative view of philosophical studies, saw that this meaningful Tao and the “Dharma” in Indian thinking and the “all existence” in Oriental thinking (Nous Logos are all a level concept. (Volume 14, page 30 of “The Selected Collection of Tang Junyi” Volume 14, Page 30) Tao is a complete, covering the universe, and covering the six senses. All things in the universe are born from it, and all things in the world are accommodated by it. From this meaning, Tao is certainly not far away from people, and people cannot far away from Tao. Cheng said: “Whether it is extreme, is there any saying that it can be separated from and not far away from it? ” (“The Collection of Two Chengs”, page 321) “About the Extreme” refers to the meaning of the Tao. From the meaning of the completeness of the Tao, the Tao is not far away, and there is no nearest saying.

But in fact, people are not always able to “About the Extreme”. The first chapter of the Doctrine of the Mean: “The Tao is not achieved, and it must be separated for a moment.” Then it is said that “it can be separated from the Tao, but it is not the Tao.” Chapter 13: “The Tao is not far away” and then it is said that “when a person is far away for the Tao, but it cannot be regarded as the Tao.” This implies this fact: people are not always opposed to the meaning of “discussing the extreme” When it comes to the complete way, people often leave Tao. This incident will naturally lead to two questions: one is why are Tao and people far away? The other is how can Tao and people be united without being far away? The previous question is to ask questions, and the latter question is a plan to answer the answer.

These two questions are major problems in China’s metaphysics. The answers to this problem by modern Chinese philosophers are often not through logical reasoning. In their opinion, this problem cannot be answered by logical reasoning.The “self-satisfied and forgot words” and the Buddhist “the mind is absolutely consciously rejecting logical reasoning methods. They use more example methods that seem insignificantly detailed. These examples are mostly fair imagination or artistic virtualization. Through metaphorical conversion, the “imaginary logic” (Chen Shaoming, page 204) [②] finally achieves the int